Skip to content
CASIENT

Comparison

Three of these four are not us.

Written for the person preparing the quote rather than the one receiving it. The columns are what you actually lose jobs to. Everything here is good at what it was built for, and the section underneath says plainly when to propose it instead of us.

Comparison of KNX with Casient against KNX alone, KNX with a logic server, and proprietary panel systems, across failure mode, ownership and maintenance.
ConsiderationKNX + CasientWhat you would quoteKNX aloneETS logic, no layerKNX + logic serverLogicMachine, Gira X1Proprietary panelControl4, Basalte, Crestron
If the controller diesThe demonstration that wins the comparisonHouse unaffected — all logic in the busNo controller to loseScenes and logic stop; switches workMost of what was sold stops
Who owns the clientYou — no direct channel existsYouYouShared with the dealer programme
Source of truth for the buildingYour ETS projectYour ETS projectETS plus a parallel configThe panel's own project file
Behaviour improves after handoverYes — learned and arbitratedNoOnly if you rewrite the logicOnly if you reprogram scenes
Two automations disagreeWorth asking of anything you are quoted againstArbitrated on six tiers, loggedLast telegram winsLast write winsLast write wins
Third-party integrationMedia, HVAC apps, streaming, appliancesMaintained and monitored by usGateway by gateway, if at allYour Lua, your maintenance burdenGood, inside their ecosystem
Who fixes it at 9pmUs for the layer, you for the busYouYouDealer support queue
Client can leave the vendorYes — a working KNX house remainsNot applicableYes, losing the logicRip and replace
Effect on your Phase 1None — added after sign-offNoneA design-time decisionDetermines the whole design

Characterisations of architecture, not benchmarks  ·  Checked September 2026 ·  Corrections welcome

What to propose

Most jobs are not ours.

  1. Quote KNX alone

    No layer

    The client wants reliable light, heat and blinds and genuinely nothing else. It will work for thirty years, and neither we nor anyone else needs to be in the room.

  2. Quote a logic server

    LogicMachine, Gira X1

    The requirement is a fixed set of known behaviours you can write once and are willing to maintain. Cheaper than us and entirely adequate when the brief really is finite.

  3. Quote the panel

    Control4, Basalte, Crestron

    AV is the centre of the job, the client wants one dealer for everything, and the showroom experience is what is being bought. We do not do AV and are not pretending to.

  4. Add Casient

    On top of your KNX

    You are losing on capability rather than on quality, the client wants a house that anticipates rather than obeys, and you want to deliver that without handing the building to a proprietary ecosystem.

Where this table is unfair to us.

Every alternative listed ships today, at volume, with a dealer network, a support line and years of field history. We have one reference installation, it is ours, and there are no paying customers. On the axis most of your clients should weight — will this still be supported in five years — all three are ahead of us, and nothing on this page changes that.

Where it is unfair to them.

Reducing Control4 or Basalte to "last write wins" flattens a great deal of real engineering — AV integration, reliability, dealer training, industrial design — that we do not do and are not attempting. A panel house is better executed than ours in most respects a guest would notice. The claim here is narrow and architectural.

If you think a cell in that table is wrong, tell us and we will change it. Being caught overstating this to a technical audience would cost more than any job it won.

Become a partner